Is torture acceptable
Information is sometimes more valuable then morals, so that justifies some tortures. If lives are in stake and if its the for the good of the country It would be best to put aside morals and sympathy. For instance, what if a bomber had placed timed bombs in public places? If the bomber is captured I think torture would be necessary and justified.
Torture can be defined as, ‘the officially sanctioned infliction of intense suffering, aimed at forcing someone to do or say something against his or her will.’ (Rodley, 2000: 7) Under international law it is illegal to use torture in any situation whatsoever. Although torture undoubtedly continues throughout the world, the moral argument.
May 14, 2011 – Torture is widely known and used as a form of punishment nowadays. It is being used at jails, at home, or any other institution to correct a mistake. But don t we think is too harsh to do something like this? And do we really think that it is acceptable to do something like this? I really think that no matter how bad or how grave the.
The problems of torture can be illustrated with the ticking bomb scenario: is it acceptable to torture someone if it results in saving thousands of lives? The ticking bomb problem The problem that even the most virtuous people face when thinking about torture is whether there is ever a case when a good result produced by torture justifies the evil.
Is torture ever an acceptable method of obtaining information? For most of us, our gut instinct is to say no and studies have shown that information obtained by the use of torture is unreliable. However, imagine a hypothetical situation where a terrorist group has planted a bomb and the government caught one of its members. This captured terrorist.
A former chairman of the National Crime Authority says torture is acceptable against terrorists and in some domestic criminal situations. And Peter Faris, QC, has drawn from the classic Clint Eastwood film Dirty Harry to illustrate why. Mr Faris today joined the debate sparked last week by the head of Deakin University s law school, Mirko Bagaric.
Oct 17, 2005 · I am one of the few people I know of who has argued in print that torture may be an ethical necessity in our war on terror. In the aftermath of Abu Ghraib. Sep 20, 2007 · Terrorism and civil liberty Is torture ever justified? Have the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001 put a lasting dent in civil liberties? The first. It is.
Is torture ever acceptable? According to the UN Convention Against Torture, any infliction of torture1 i.e. waterboarding is banned under international law and the domestic laws of most countries in the 21st century. The point of contention is whether torture under any circumstances should be entirely prohibited. This opinion piece will be centered.
Imagine that a known terrorist has planted a bomb in the heart of a nearby city. He now sits in your custody. Rather than conceal his guilt, he gloats about the forthcoming explosion and the magnitude of human suffering it will cause. Given this state of affairs–in particular, given that there is still time to prevent an imminent atrocity–it.